Physics and I

Physics and I have love-hate relationship. It's such an intriguing intellectual puzzle; however, it annoys me so. Logic and physics are oil and water. That this for example. Today I was trying to come up with a better definition of mass. So, to come up with a better defintion, we need to see how it was created. Well, for that we must go to the Big Bang and the singularity. But to understand the singularity, one needs to understanding general relativity...and to understand GR, one needs SR. The fundamental equations of SR are based on the definition of mass.

Well, shit.

Damn it Godel, why must you screw everything up?

Posting

As many of you have notice, I am not one to keep up to date with posting for this blog. But I am quite certain that everyone can empathize with my predicament. For any time I think of the things that I need to do, I think of the things that I need to do. And I do the things that I need to do. But when I am done with the things that I need to do, I no longer have to think of the things I need to do. So I don't think about updating the blog, which is a thing that I need to do. Try to say that ten times fast.

So as you can see, updating the blog is a difficult thing to do.

In other news, the angle CAN be trisected--just make three copies of an angle, put them together, and PRESTO, a trisected angle. Take that Gauss.

P.S. To anyone who spots the logical fallacy in the first paragraph--I do not want to hear it.